[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTE7eUyrb8+J+ORB@andrea>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:21:45 +0200
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
christoph.muellner@...ll.eu, David.Laight@...lab.com,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add Zawrs support and use it for spinlocks
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 01:47:13PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
>
> Zawrs [0] was ratified in november 2022 [1], so I've resurrect the patch
> adding Zawrs support for spinlocks and adapted it to recent kernel
> changes.
>
> Also incorporated are the nice comments David Laight provided on v2.
>
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebase on top of 6.4-rc1
> - Adapt to changed alternatives Kconfig handling
> - Adapt to changed cpufeature extension handling
> - Address review comments from David Laight
> - better handling for 32/64bit cases (less ifdefery)
> - less macros calling macros
> - don't duplicate __smp_load_reserved_relaxed in
> __smp_load_reserved_aquire
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fixing type checking code for 32/64-bit values
> - Adjustments according to the specification change
> - Adding "depends on !XIP_KERNEL" to RISCV_ISA_ZAWRS
>
>
> [0] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zawrs/blob/main/zawrs.adoc
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zawrs/commit/9ff54f7e7fcd95cf1b111d2e54276ff1183bcd37
>
> Christoph Müllner (1):
> riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocks
>
> Heiko Stuebner (1):
> riscv: don't include kernel.h into alternative.h
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 10 +++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h | 1 -
> arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h | 14 ++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Heiko and Christoph,
I was wondering about the plan for this series: am I missing some update to
this discussion? do we have a new version to review?
I actually went ahead (as Palmer suggested in private :-) ) and spent some
time trying to integrate feedback provided in this thread into your changes,
obtaining the diff below (on 6.6-rc6, the #include removal fixes some nommu
builds and should/can be splitted into a separate patch); thoughts?
Andrea
>From 79d25361ddd4a14db6ce94aec140efbdf2d89684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 02:22:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: Implement LR+WRS-based smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}()
The Zawrs extension defines instructions allowing a core to enter
a low-power state and wait on a store to a memory location.
Introduce the Zawrs-instruction WRS.STO and use it in the polling
loops of the macros smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}().
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
[based on the arm64 implementation and work from Heiko and Christoph]
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 14 +++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 3 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
6 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index d607ab0f7c6da..ff49f90d175ba 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -489,6 +489,20 @@ config RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT
If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
+config RISCV_ISA_ZAWRS
+ bool "Zawrs extension support for wait-on-reservation-set instructions"
+ depends on RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
+ default y
+ help
+ Adds support to dynamically detect the presence of the Zawrs
+ extension and enable its usage.
+
+ The Zawrs extension defines a pair of instructions to be used
+ in polling loops that allows a core to enter a low-power state
+ and wait on a store to a memory location.
+
+ If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
+
config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_V
bool
default y
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
index 110752594228e..7ab7a28e72210 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -71,6 +71,32 @@ do { \
*/
#define smp_mb__after_spinlock() RISCV_FENCE(iorw,iorw)
+#define smp_cond_load_relaxed(ptr, cond_expr) \
+({ \
+ typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
+ __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
+ for (;;) { \
+ VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
+ if (cond_expr) \
+ break; \
+ __cmpwait_relaxed(__PTR, VAL); \
+ } \
+ (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
+})
+
+#define smp_cond_load_acquire(ptr, cond_expr) \
+({ \
+ typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
+ __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
+ for (;;) { \
+ VAL = smp_load_acquire(__PTR); \
+ if (cond_expr) \
+ break; \
+ __cmpwait_relaxed(__PTR, VAL); \
+ } \
+ (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
+})
+
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 2f4726d3cfcc2..65bc21379f40e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -8,8 +8,11 @@
#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/fence.h>
+#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/insn-def.h>
#define __xchg_relaxed(ptr, new, size) \
({ \
@@ -360,4 +363,52 @@
arch_cmpxchg_relaxed((ptr), (o), (n)); \
})
+#define __CMPWAIT_CASE(w, sz) \
+static inline void __cmpwait_case_##sz(volatile void *ptr, \
+ unsigned long val) \
+{ \
+ unsigned long tmp; \
+ \
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( \
+ __nops(4), \
+ "lr." #w "\t" "%[tmp], %[v]\n\t" \
+ "xor %[tmp], %[tmp], %[val]\n\t" \
+ "bnez %[tmp], 1f\n\t" \
+ WRS_sto "\n\t" \
+ "1:\n", \
+ 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZAWRS, CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZAWRS) \
+ : [tmp] "=&r" (tmp), [v] "+A" (*(u##sz *)ptr) \
+ : [val] "rJ" (val) \
+ : "memory"); \
+}
+
+__CMPWAIT_CASE(w, 32);
+__CMPWAIT_CASE(d, 64);
+
+#undef __CMPWAIT_CASE
+
+#define __CMPWAIT_GEN() \
+static __always_inline void __cmpwait(volatile void *ptr, \
+ unsigned long val, \
+ int size) \
+{ \
+ switch (size) { \
+ case 4: \
+ return __cmpwait_case_32(ptr, val); \
+ case 8: \
+ return __cmpwait_case_64(ptr, val); \
+ default: \
+ BUILD_BUG(); \
+ } \
+ \
+ unreachable(); \
+}
+
+__CMPWAIT_GEN()
+
+#undef __CMPWAIT_GEN
+
+#define __cmpwait_relaxed(ptr, val) \
+ __cmpwait((ptr), (unsigned long)(val), sizeof(*(ptr)))
+
#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_CMPXCHG_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index b7b58258f6c7c..afabcbf849526 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR 40
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI 41
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM 42
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZAWRS 43
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX 64
@@ -69,8 +70,6 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#include <linux/jump_label.h>
-
unsigned long riscv_get_elf_hwcap(void);
struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
index 6960beb75f329..fecb744ed7b29 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h
@@ -196,4 +196,6 @@
INSN_I(OPCODE_MISC_MEM, FUNC3(2), __RD(0), \
RS1(base), SIMM12(4))
+#define WRS_sto ".long 0x01d00073"
+
#endif /* __ASM_INSN_DEF_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 1cfbba65d11ae..044682f54f78f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svinval, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVINVAL),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svnapot, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVNAPOT),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(svpbmt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SVPBMT),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zawrs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZAWRS),
};
const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists