lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231019142646.iw6x72y6sqt4q2uw@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:26:46 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/7] dt-bindings: net: mvusb: Fix up DSA
 example

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:45:14AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:37:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:32 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,mvusb.example.dtb: /example-0/usb/mdio@...thernet-switch@0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['marvell,mv88e6190']
> > 
> > Isn't that just because the bindings now come last in the series.
> > Which is in response to a review comment, hence this warning
> > didn't appear before.
> 
> Yes. The only option that avoids this is squashing the 2 patches. I 
> think it is fine to leave this as-is.
> 
> Rob

Anyway, I'm surprised that the bot would send this email, since the
warning existed prior to this patch, and I would expect that the bot
only notifies of newly introduced issues.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ