[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f0be064-c857-4310-8ca0-27c16b8c5757@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:35:01 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Kris Chaplin <kris.chaplin@....com>
Cc: thomas.delev@....com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
git@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: w1: Add YAML DT schema for AMD AXI w1
host and MAINTAINERS entry
On 10/19/23 16:30, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 07:24:17AM -0700, Kris Chaplin wrote:
>> Add YAML DT schema for the AMD AXI w1 host IP.
>>
>> This hardware guarantees protocol timing for driving off-board devices such
>> as thermal sensors, proms, etc using the 1wire protocol.
>>
>> Add MAINTAINERS entry for DT schema.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Thomas Delev <thomas.delev@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Delev <thomas.delev@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kris Chaplin <kris.chaplin@....com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
>> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..ef70fa2c0c5d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/w1/amd,axi-1wire-host.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: AMD AXI 1-wire bus host for programmable logic
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Kris Chaplin <kris.chaplin@....com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + const: amd,axi-1wire-host
>
> I was happy with it before, and still am I guess, given that there is an
> IP version register that can be used to determine which version of the
> IP is in use.
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
I think we discussed that already that identification register should be
described as the part of commit message to make this clear.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists