[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231019150108.mwzinguhn6zxrzbu@quack3>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:01:08 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: treat end of range as exclusive in
ext4_zero_range()
On Fri 29-09-23 19:40:43, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> The call to filemap_write_and_wait_range() assumes the range passed to be
> inclusive, so fix the call to make sure we follow that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Yes, makes sense. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index e4115d338f10..c79b4c25afc4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -4522,7 +4522,8 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
> * Round up offset. This is not fallocate, we need to zero out
> * blocks, so convert interior block aligned part of the range to
> * unwritten and possibly manually zero out unaligned parts of the
> - * range.
> + * range. Here, start and partial_begin are inclusive, end and
> + * partial_end are exclusive.
> */
> start = round_up(offset, 1 << blkbits);
> end = round_down((offset + len), 1 << blkbits);
> @@ -4608,7 +4609,7 @@ static long ext4_zero_range(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
> * disk in case of crash before zeroing trans is committed.
> */
> if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
> - ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, start, end);
> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, start, end - 1);
> if (ret) {
> filemap_invalidate_unlock(mapping);
> goto out_mutex;
> --
> 2.39.3
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists