linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: vme_user: Replace printk() with pr_*(),dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023101939-portable-spoof-5fa0@gregkh>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:31:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@...el.com>
Cc:     Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@...il.com>,
        Martyn Welch <martyn@...chs.me.uk>,
        Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...il.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: vme_user: Replace printk() with
 pr_*(),dev_*()

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:45:30PM +0200, Karolina Stolarek wrote:
> On 19.10.2023 09:20, Soumya Negi wrote:
> > vme.c uses printk() to log messages. To improve and standardize message
> > formatting, use logging mechanisms pr_err()/pr_warn() and
> > dev_err()/dev_warn() instead. Retain the printk log levels of the
> > messages during replacement.
> > 
> > Issue found by checkpatch.pl
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > * Change the pr_*() calls used to replace printk's in v1 to dev_*()
> >    wherever possible, as it adds more context to the message.
> >    (as per feedback from julia.lawall@...ia.fr &
> >    gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)
> 
> You don't have to include the change log here, as it's already in the cover
> letter. This space is usually used when a patch is not sent as a part of the
> series.

Either or both is fine, this is not a real issue at all, thanks

greg k-h