[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsbwWpDVR9KJXx8UO5MXsYT81uAJbLLNDnLianr8jmXUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:07:02 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: ftrace: Internal error: Oops: sve_save_state
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 17:52, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 01:34:18PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> > Following kernel crash noticed while running selftests: ftrace:
> > ftracetest-ktap on FVP models running stable-rc 6.5.8-rc2.
>
> > This is not an easy to reproduce issue and not seen on mainline and next.
> > We are investigating this report.
>
> To confirm have you seen this on other stables as well or is this only
> v6.5? For how long have you been seeing this?
This is only seen on 6.5.8-rc2 and seen only once.
I have checked on mainline / next and other stable branches and this crash
is not seen anywhere else.
However, I will keep checking them on other branches and next and mainline.
>
> > [ 764.987161] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > virtual address 0000000000000000
>
> > [ 765.074221] Call trace:
> > [ 765.075045] sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0
> > [ 765.076138] fpsimd_thread_switch+0x2c/0xe8
> > [ 765.077305] __switch_to+0x20/0x158
> > [ 765.078384] __schedule+0x2cc/0xb38
> > [ 765.079464] preempt_schedule_irq+0x44/0xa8
> > [ 765.080633] el1_interrupt+0x4c/0x68
> > [ 765.081691] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28
> > [ 765.082829] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
> > [ 765.083874] ftrace_return_to_handler+0x98/0x158
> > [ 765.085090] return_to_handler+0x20/0x48
> > [ 765.086205] do_sve_acc+0x64/0x128
> > [ 765.087272] el0_sve_acc+0x3c/0xa0
> > [ 765.088356] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x114/0x130
> > [ 765.089524] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x198
>
> So something managed to get flagged as having SVE state without having
> the backing storage allocated. We *were* preempted in the SVE access
> handler which does the allocation but I can't see the path that would
> trigger that since we allocate the state before setting TIF_SVE. It's
> possible the compiler did something funky, a decode of the backtrace
> might help show that?
We have not uploaded vmlinux and System.map to this specific build.
However, I have requested to have these files get uploaded for upcoming
builds.
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists