linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fix for 6.6-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whiXFXaVrvN2pYUuzDX+xsuU6ogpU69v9yiPS7F+dFbOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:06:24 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     dave@...os.cz, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fix for 6.6-rc7

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 08:12, David Sterba <dave@...os.cz> wrote:
>
> I don't see this pull request merged after 2 days and I don't see any
> reply from you that there would be any problem.

Indeed, I don't see the original in my mailbox, so re-sending it was
most definitely the right thing to do.

> The mail is in lore archives
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1697555249.git.dsterba@suse.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1697555249.git.dsterba@suse.com/

Usually it goes the other way, where I see emails in my mailbox, but
not in lore.

I do check my spambox daily too, but honestly, it's a "quick scan" not
some deeper thing. So might have gotten deleted if it didn't stand out
to me clearly enough.

> what's a bit suspicious is the "X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++++++++++" header in
> the raw message, this could explain it. Please let me know how to
> proceed, thanks.

This was the right way - re-send in a couple of days if you feel like
things aren't moving along as they should and normally do.

Obviously the first merge window week is different - at that point it
can take me a few days just to get to it - so then "two days" might be
more like "four or five days".

              Linus