| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CO1PR10MB4563810AA52A2928DF8C80AC98D4A@CO1PR10MB4563.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:44:21 +0000
From: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2] Consider inflight IO in io accounting for high latency
devices
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 12:26 AM
> To: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@...cle.com>; Bart Van Assche
> <bvanassche@....org>; linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Consider inflight IO in io accounting for high latency
> devices
>
> Please fix your quoting, it's impossible to have coherent threads otherwise.
> This is the third time I'm bringing that up, but it's just being ignored. Not the
> best way to have a fruitful discussion on how best to fix this.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
Sorry Jens. That was the problem with the configuration of the mail client I was using. I am extremely sorry for the inconvenience.
Regarding the fix, I thought that most of the faster devices will have more than 1 queue. Sorry for that misinterpretation. Now I understood the issue with the fix here.
I was trying to understand how to fix this issue. Can you please provide your suggestions?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists