linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bmp280: fix eoc interrupt usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTFkKl6Qu4vpfcC4@anderl>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:15:22 +0200
From:   Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sergei Korolev <dssoftsk@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bmp280: fix eoc interrupt usage

Hi Andy,

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> schrieb am Do, 19. Okt 19:54:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:22:09PM +0200, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> > Only the bmp085 can have an End-Of-Conversion (EOC) interrupt. But the
> > bmp085 and bmp180 share the same chip id. Therefore it's necessary to
> > distinguish the case in which the interrupt is set.
> > 
> > Fix the if statement so that only when the interrupt is set and the chip
> > id is recognized the interrupt is requested.
> > 
> > This bug exists since the support of EOC interrupt was introduced.
> 
> > Fixes: aae953949651 ("iio: pressure: bmp280: add support for BMP085 EOC interrupt")
> 
> As Jonathan already commented, this is part of a tag block below...
> 
> > Also add a link to bmp085 datasheet for reference.
> > 
> 
> ...somewhere here.
> 
> > Suggested-by: Sergei Korolev <dssoftsk@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> > ---
> >  v1 -> v2: Remove extra space (seen by Andy)
> 
> 
> And seems Jonathan mentioned that this is already fixed in his tree.
> Did I understand that correctly?

I just read it in the archive. For some reason I didn't get Jonathans mail
yesterday. Sorry for the spam.

Andreas