[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231019113627.bca226b1ac17fe9c3beecb21@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:36:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, hannes@...xchg.org,
cerasuolodomenico@...il.com, sjenning@...hat.com,
ddstreet@...e.org, vitaly.wool@...sulko.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] workload-specific and memory pressure-driven
zswap writeback
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:31:17 -0700 Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com> wrote:
> > There are parts of the code that I would feel more comfortable if
> > someone took a look at (which I mentioned in individual patches). So
> > unless this happens in the next few days I wouldn't say so.
> >
>
> I'm not super familiar with the other series. How big is the dependency?
> Looks like it's just a small part in the swapcache code right?
>
> If this is the case, I feel like the best course of action is to rebase
> the mempolicy patch series on top of mm-unstable, and resolve
> this merge conflict.
OK, thanks.
Hugh, do you have time to look at rebasing on the mm-stable which I
pushed out 15 minutes ago?
> I will then send out v4 of the zswap shrinker,
> rebased on top of the mempolicy patch series.
>
> If this is not the case, one thing we can do is:
>
> a) Fix bugs (there's one kernel test robot it seems)
> b) Fix user-visible details (writeback counter for e.g)
>
> and just merge the series for now. FWIW, this is an optional
> feature and disabled by default. So performance optimization
> and aesthetics change (list_lru_add() renaming etc.) can wait.
>
> We can push out v4 by the end of today and early tomorrow
> if all goes well. Then everyone can review and comment on it.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists