linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] net/socket: Break down __sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 13:37:51 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, sdf@...gle.com,
        asml.silence@...il.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, krisman@...e.de,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/11] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt

On 10/19/23 1:04 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/19/23 1:12 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> On 10/16/23 6:47?AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
>>> index 0087f8c071e7..f4c156a1987e 100644
>>> --- a/net/socket.c
>>> +++ b/net/socket.c
>>> @@ -2350,6 +2350,42 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(setsockopt, int, fd, int, level, int, optname,
>>>    INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(bool tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level,
>>>                                 int optname));
>>>    +int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>>> +               int optname, sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen)
>>> +{
>>> +    int max_optlen __maybe_unused;
>>> +    const struct proto_ops *ops;
>>> +    int err;
>>> +
>>> +    err = security_socket_getsockopt(sock, level, optname);
>>> +    if (err)
>>> +        return err;
>>> +
>>> +    ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
>>> +    if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
>>> +        err = sk_getsockopt(sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
>>> +    } else if (unlikely(!ops->getsockopt)) {
>>> +        err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        if (WARN_ONCE(optval.is_kernel || optlen.is_kernel,
>>> +                  "Invalid argument type"))
>>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> +        err = ops->getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval.user,
>>> +                      optlen.user);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (!compat) {
>>> +        max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
>>
>> The max_optlen was done before the above sk_getsockopt. The bpf CI cannot catch it because it cannot apply patch 5 cleanly. I ran the following out of the linux-block tree:
>>
>> $> ./test_progs -t sockopt_sk
>> test_sockopt_sk:PASS:join_cgroup /sockopt_sk 0 nsec
>> run_test:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
>> run_test:PASS:setsockopt_link 0 nsec
>> run_test:PASS:getsockopt_link 0 nsec
>> (/data/users/kafai/fb-kernel/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c:111: errno: Operation not permitted) Failed to call getsockopt, ret=-1
>> run_test:FAIL:getsetsockopt unexpected error: -1 (errno 1)
>> #217     sockopt_sk:FAIL
> 
> Does it work with this incremental? I can fold that in, will rebase
> anyway to collect acks.

Yes, that should work.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>

> 
> 
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index bccd257e13fe..eb6960958026 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -2344,6 +2344,9 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>   	if (err)
>   		return err;
>   
> +	if (!compat)
> +		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> +
>   	ops = READ_ONCE(sock->ops);
>   	if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
>   		err = sk_getsockopt(sock->sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
> @@ -2358,12 +2361,10 @@ int do_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, bool compat, int level,
>   				      optlen.user);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!compat) {
> -		max_optlen = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT_MAX_OPTLEN(optlen);
> +	if (!compat)
>   		err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT(sock->sk, level, optname,
>   						     optval, optlen, max_optlen,
>   						     err);
> -	}
>   
>   	return err;
>   }
>