linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: document IPQ6018

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231019064938.am5qbaqsio7h7zal@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:19:38 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        ilia.lin@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-nvmem: document
 IPQ6018

On 16-10-23, 19:55, Robert Marko wrote:
> Document IPQ6018 compatible for Qcom NVMEM CPUFreq driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml          | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml
> index 7391660a25ac9..f929892d654ea 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.yaml
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ select:
>            - qcom,apq8064
>            - qcom,apq8096
>            - qcom,ipq5332
> +          - qcom,ipq6018
>            - qcom,ipq8064
>            - qcom,ipq8074
>            - qcom,ipq9574

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh