[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1258129392.18842.1697703134703.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:12:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, kernel@...rdevices.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] jffs2: make cleanmarker support option
Martin,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Martin Kurbanov" <mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com>
> This patch support for disable cleanmarker option. This is useful on
> some NAND devices which entire OOB area is protected by ECC. Problem
> fires when JFFS2 driver writes cleanmarker to some page and later it
> tries to write to this page - write will be done successfully, but after
> that such page becomes unreadable due to invalid ECC codes. This occurs
> because the second write necessitates an update to ECC, but it is
> impossible to do it correctly without block erase.
Hmm, I miss an explanation why this change is correct and safe.
You explain why the OOB area can't be used, okay. But you need to
add more details on why you change is safe in terms of filesystem
consistency.
Beside of that, I don't think this should be kernel config option.
Why not a mount option?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists