[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231019-smith-purging-627c50cfa3de@spud>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:24:11 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
Cc: Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] riscv: hwprobe: factorize hwprobe ISA extension
reporting
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Indeed the comment was a bit misleading, is this more clear ?
>
> /*
> * Only use CHECK_ISA_EXT() for extensions which are usable by
> * userspace with respect to the kernel current configuration.
> * For instance, ISA extensions that uses float operations
s/that uses/that use/
> * should not be exposed when CONFIG_FPU is not set.
s/is not set/is not enabled/
But yeah, definitely more clear, thanks.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists