linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Revert "pinctrl: avoid unsafe code pattern in find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTEdzVViUPdk3pk/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:15:09 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ferry Toth <ftoth@...londelft.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Revert "pinctrl: avoid unsafe code pattern in
 find_pinctrl()"

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:12:57AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 12:41 AM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

...

> > Given that there are more issues in that code, maybe we should revert
> > the patch for now so Andy has a chance to convert to UUID/LABEL booting?
> 
> Yeah I reverted it, the above elaboration may apply to this patch
> too and makes me feel we are "mostly safe" in this regard anyway.

Thank you!

And on my side I'll try my best to avoid static enumerations.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko