| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <c960df0db27ae55b9e9babdcfe842e75fb44ccbc.1697703785.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:33:47 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mgorman@...hsingularity.net, hughd@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
ying.huang@...el.com, ziy@...dia.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: migrate: record the mlocked page status to remove unnecessary lru drain
When doing compaction, I found the lru_add_drain() is an obvious hotspot
when migrating pages. The distribution of this hotspot is as follows:
- 18.75% compact_zone
- 17.39% migrate_pages
- 13.79% migrate_pages_batch
- 11.66% migrate_folio_move
- 7.02% lru_add_drain
+ 7.02% lru_add_drain_cpu
+ 3.00% move_to_new_folio
1.23% rmap_walk
+ 1.92% migrate_folio_unmap
+ 3.20% migrate_pages_sync
+ 0.90% isolate_migratepages
The lru_add_drain() was added by commit c3096e6782b7 ("mm/migrate:
__unmap_and_move() push good newpage to LRU") to drain the newpage to LRU
immediately, to help to build up the correct newpage->mlock_count in
remove_migration_ptes() for mlocked pages. However, if there are no mlocked
pages are migrating, then we can avoid this lru drain operation, especailly
for the heavy concurrent scenarios.
So we can record the source pages' mlocked status in migrate_folio_unmap(),
and only drain the lru list when the mlocked status is set in migrate_folio_move().
In addition, the page was already isolated from lru when migrating, so checking
the mlocked status is stable by folio_test_mlocked() in migrate_folio_unmap().
After this patch, I can see the hotpot of the lru_add_drain() is gone:
- 9.41% migrate_pages_batch
- 6.15% migrate_folio_move
- 3.64% move_to_new_folio
+ 1.80% migrate_folio_extra
+ 1.70% buffer_migrate_folio
+ 1.41% rmap_walk
+ 0.62% folio_add_lru
+ 3.07% migrate_folio_unmap
Meanwhile, the compaction latency shows some improvements when running
thpscale:
base patched
Amean fault-both-1 1131.22 ( 0.00%) 1112.55 * 1.65%*
Amean fault-both-3 2489.75 ( 0.00%) 2324.15 * 6.65%*
Amean fault-both-5 3257.37 ( 0.00%) 3183.18 * 2.28%*
Amean fault-both-7 4257.99 ( 0.00%) 4079.04 * 4.20%*
Amean fault-both-12 6614.02 ( 0.00%) 6075.60 * 8.14%*
Amean fault-both-18 10607.78 ( 0.00%) 8978.86 * 15.36%*
Amean fault-both-24 14911.65 ( 0.00%) 11619.55 * 22.08%*
Amean fault-both-30 14954.67 ( 0.00%) 14925.66 * 0.19%*
Amean fault-both-32 16654.87 ( 0.00%) 15580.31 * 6.45%*
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
Chages from v1:
- Use separate flags in __migrate_folio_record() to avoid to pack flags
in each call site per Ying.
---
mm/migrate.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 125194f5af0f..fac96139dbba 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1027,22 +1027,39 @@ union migration_ptr {
struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
struct address_space *mapping;
};
+
+enum {
+ PAGE_WAS_MAPPED = 1 << 0,
+ PAGE_WAS_MLOCKED = 1 << 1,
+};
+
static void __migrate_folio_record(struct folio *dst,
- unsigned long page_was_mapped,
+ unsigned int page_was_mapped,
+ unsigned int page_was_mlocked,
struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
{
union migration_ptr ptr = { .anon_vma = anon_vma };
+ unsigned long page_flags = 0;
+
+ if (page_was_mapped)
+ page_flags |= PAGE_WAS_MAPPED;
+ if (page_was_mlocked)
+ page_flags |= PAGE_WAS_MLOCKED;
dst->mapping = ptr.mapping;
- dst->private = (void *)page_was_mapped;
+ dst->private = (void *)page_flags;
}
static void __migrate_folio_extract(struct folio *dst,
int *page_was_mappedp,
+ int *page_was_mlocked,
struct anon_vma **anon_vmap)
{
union migration_ptr ptr = { .mapping = dst->mapping };
+ unsigned long page_flags = (unsigned long)dst->private;
+
*anon_vmap = ptr.anon_vma;
- *page_was_mappedp = (unsigned long)dst->private;
+ *page_was_mappedp = page_flags & PAGE_WAS_MAPPED ? 1 : 0;
+ *page_was_mlocked = page_flags & PAGE_WAS_MLOCKED ? 1 : 0;
dst->mapping = NULL;
dst->private = NULL;
}
@@ -1103,7 +1120,7 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_folio_t get_new_folio,
{
struct folio *dst;
int rc = -EAGAIN;
- int page_was_mapped = 0;
+ int page_was_mapped = 0, page_was_mlocked = 0;
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
bool is_lru = !__folio_test_movable(src);
bool locked = false;
@@ -1157,6 +1174,7 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_folio_t get_new_folio,
folio_lock(src);
}
locked = true;
+ page_was_mlocked = folio_test_mlocked(src);
if (folio_test_writeback(src)) {
/*
@@ -1206,7 +1224,8 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_folio_t get_new_folio,
dst_locked = true;
if (unlikely(!is_lru)) {
- __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped, anon_vma);
+ __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped,
+ page_was_mlocked, anon_vma);
return MIGRATEPAGE_UNMAP;
}
@@ -1236,7 +1255,8 @@ static int migrate_folio_unmap(new_folio_t get_new_folio,
}
if (!folio_mapped(src)) {
- __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped, anon_vma);
+ __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped,
+ page_was_mlocked, anon_vma);
return MIGRATEPAGE_UNMAP;
}
@@ -1261,12 +1281,13 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
struct list_head *ret)
{
int rc;
- int page_was_mapped = 0;
+ int page_was_mapped = 0, page_was_mlocked = 0;
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
bool is_lru = !__folio_test_movable(src);
struct list_head *prev;
- __migrate_folio_extract(dst, &page_was_mapped, &anon_vma);
+ __migrate_folio_extract(dst, &page_was_mapped,
+ &page_was_mlocked, &anon_vma);
prev = dst->lru.prev;
list_del(&dst->lru);
@@ -1287,7 +1308,7 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
* isolated from the unevictable LRU: but this case is the easiest.
*/
folio_add_lru(dst);
- if (page_was_mapped)
+ if (page_was_mlocked)
lru_add_drain();
if (page_was_mapped)
@@ -1322,7 +1343,8 @@ static int migrate_folio_move(free_folio_t put_new_folio, unsigned long private,
*/
if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
list_add(&dst->lru, prev);
- __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped, anon_vma);
+ __migrate_folio_record(dst, page_was_mapped,
+ page_was_mlocked, anon_vma);
return rc;
}
@@ -1799,10 +1821,11 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
dst = list_first_entry(&dst_folios, struct folio, lru);
dst2 = list_next_entry(dst, lru);
list_for_each_entry_safe(folio, folio2, &unmap_folios, lru) {
- int page_was_mapped = 0;
+ int page_was_mapped = 0, page_was_mlocked = 0;
struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
- __migrate_folio_extract(dst, &page_was_mapped, &anon_vma);
+ __migrate_folio_extract(dst, &page_was_mapped,
+ &page_was_mlocked, &anon_vma);
migrate_folio_undo_src(folio, page_was_mapped, anon_vma,
true, ret_folios);
list_del(&dst->lru);
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists