[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTLC5Jo97gYsL5wX@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:11:48 +0300
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
len.brown@...el.com, robert.moore@...el.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, mark.rutland@....com,
will@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com, bala.senthil@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] ACPI: utils: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for
matching _UID
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:11:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:38 PM Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:36:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:17:28PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Convert manual _UID references to use standard ACPI helpers.
> > >
> > > Yes, while not so obvious this is the correct replacement.
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > I think this is the only case which would suffer from the more obvious
> > behaviour, i.e.
> >
> > bool acpi_dev_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *uid2)
> > {
> > const char *uid1 = acpi_device_uid(adev);
> >
> > return uid1 && uid2 && !strcmp(uid1, uid2);
> > }
> >
> > That said, we can't be particularly sure about it's potential future users,
> > especially when the usage will not be limited to just ACPI core since we're
> > exporting it.
>
> I actually agree with this, so please switch over to the above.
Will send out a v2, thanks.
Andy, can I add your review for this?
Raag
Powered by blists - more mailing lists