[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR21MB1335B68B21B1F37ECC6D77F0BFDBA@SA1PR21MB1335.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:00:13 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"stefan.bader@...onical.com" <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
"roxana.nicolescu@...onical.com" <roxana.nicolescu@...onical.com>,
"cascardo@...onical.com" <cascardo@...onical.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
"matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@...ia.com"
<matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@...ia.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/mm: Print the encryption features correctly when a
paravisor is present
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 11:40 AM
> To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan
> [...]
> On 10/19/23 23:01, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > This patch only modifies x86 related files. I think it's unlikely to see
> > a third hardware Coco implementation for x86 in the foreseeable feature
> (?)
>
> OK, then what good is this patch in the first place? If you are right,
> then this would give equivalent information:
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -q Intel && echo 'TDX'
> cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -q AMD && echo 'SEV'
>
> No kernel patching needed, right?
Currently arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c: print_mem_encrypt_feature_info()
prints an incorrect and confusing message
"Memory Encryption Features active: AMD SEV".
when an Intel TDX VM with a paravisor runs on Hyper-V.
So I think a kernel patch is needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists