[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231020164917.6fb6f89b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 16:49:17 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_buf: fix a misleading comment
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:38:49 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> The comment for seq_buf_has_overflowed() says that an overflow condition is
> marked by len == size, but that's not what the code is testing. Make the
> comment match reality.
>
I guess we can add:
Fixes: 8cd709ae7658a ("tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer")
Thanks!
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> ---
> include/linux/seq_buf.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> index 515d7fcb9634..026302765494 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ seq_buf_init(struct seq_buf *s, char *buf, unsigned int size)
>
> /*
> * seq_buf have a buffer that might overflow. When this happens
> - * the len and size are set to be equal.
> + * len is set to be greater than size.
> */
> static inline bool
> seq_buf_has_overflowed(struct seq_buf *s)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists