[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169783679849.2217970.1585610113132508409.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:21:15 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: irogers@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iii@...ux.ibm.com, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org
Cc: sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Use the right bpf_probe_read(_str) variant for reading user data
On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:26:42 +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Perf test case 111 Check open filename arg using perf trace + vfs_getname
> fails on s390. This is caused by a failing function
> bpf_probe_read() in file util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c.
>
> The root cause is the lookup by address. Function bpf_probe_read()
> is used. This function works only for architectures
> with ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists