linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] arm64: dts: Update cache properties for socionext

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ccb48488-7fa2-4784-8c5c-7d6084d16016@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 23:26:41 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, soc@...nel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] arm64: dts: Update cache properties for
 socionext

On 20/10/2023 21:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
> 
> The DeviceTree Specification v0.3 specifies that the cache node
> 'compatible' and 'cache-level' properties are 'required'. Cf.
> s3.8 Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes
> The 'cache-unified' property should be present if one of the
> properties for unified cache is present ('cache-size', ...).
> 
> Update the Device Trees accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107155825.1644604-21-pierre.gondois@arm.com
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> I noticed this one fell thru the cracks from the rest of the series.
> 
> Arnd, Can you take this directly.

A bit after Pierre - in April 2023 - I sent similar which was said to be
"applied":
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f9a2c0d7-a78d-9368-f9bb-e8aba11e7d81@socionext.com/

Maybe the Socionext status in MAINTAINERS should be odd fixes?

Best regards,
Krzysztof