lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe56d275-a859-4f0e-8652-88fb1b12bf93@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 08:59:13 +0200
From:   "Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Gong, Richard" <Richard.Gong@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: X86 parallel bring up regression

[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 19.10.23 22:26, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> 
> We've recently found that there was a regression from 6.5 that broke
> resume from suspend-to-ram on some AMD platforms.
> 
> We bisected it and confirmed it's introduced by 0c7ffa32dbd6
> ("x86/smpboot/64: Implement arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and
> enable it").
> 
> Furthermore; we confirmed that on 6.6-rc6 adding cpuhp.parallel=0 to the
> kernel command line avoids the issue.
> 
> Here are bootup kernel logs from an affected system at 7e75178 (doesn't
> reproduce) and 0c7ffa32 (does reproduce).
> https://gist.github.com/superm1/c251c0849956b8389309f03871fba091
> 
> Is it possible that this is caused by the system entering S3 with x2apic
> enabled but leaving with it disabled?
> 
> I notice in the resume path on a boot with cpuhp.parallel=0 that x2apic
> "explicitly" gets turned on again.
> 
> <snip>
> smpboot: CPU 127 is now offline
> ACPI: PM: Low-level resume complete
> ACPI: PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
> x2apic enabled
> AMD-Vi: Virtual APIC enabled
> AMD-Vi: Virtual APIC enabled
> LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
> Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
> smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
> masked ExtINT on CPU#1
> ACPI: \_SB_.PLTF.C002: Found 2 idle states
> CPU1 is up
> smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x4
> </snip>
> 
> I hypothesize this could be caused by .Lread_apicid finding x2apic
> disabled but then trying to read from apic_mmio_base which isn't
> initialized because x2apic was used (AFAICT apic_set_fixmap() never gets
> called in this case).

Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the
cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression
tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced 0c7ffa32dbd6
#regzbot title x86: resume from suspend-to-ram broken on some AMD platforms
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
the footer of this mail.

Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
to the report (the parent of this mail). See page linked in footer for
details.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ