[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202310201455.d9efae-oliver.sang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:03:25 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@...nel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
<fengwei.yin@...el.com>, <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [xfs] cbc06310c3: filebench.sum_operations/s -40.3%
regression
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a -40.3% regression of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
commit: cbc06310c36f73a5f3b0c6f0d974d60cf66d816b ("xfs: reinstate the old i_version counter as STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
testcase: filebench
test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8260L CPU @ 2.40GHz (Cascade Lake) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: xfs
fs2: nfsv4
test: filemicro_rread.f
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202310201455.d9efae-oliver.sang@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231020/202310201455.d9efae-oliver.sang@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs2/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/1HDD/nfsv4/xfs/x86_64-rhel-8.3/debian-11.1-x86_64-20220510.cgz/lkp-csl-2sp3/filemicro_rread.f/filebench
commit:
f93b930030 ("xfs: Remove duplicate include")
cbc06310c3 ("xfs: reinstate the old i_version counter as STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE")
f93b9300301d30f2 cbc06310c36f73a5f3b0c6f0d97
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
0.05 ± 3% +0.0 0.05 ± 6% mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
1801 ± 3% +192.8% 5272 ± 5% vmstat.system.cs
34136 ± 3% +47.7% 50422 ± 5% meminfo.Active
264.26 ± 11% +6281.8% 16864 ± 20% meminfo.Active(file)
22783 ± 7% +1234.4% 304018 ± 7% turbostat.C1
0.03 ± 17% +0.0 0.06 ± 11% turbostat.C1%
60181 ± 10% +93.2% 116249 ± 7% turbostat.POLL
68.91 +1.0% 69.58 turbostat.PkgWatt
64.00 -40.2% 38.24 ± 13% filebench.sum_bytes_mb/s
32765 -40.3% 19568 ± 13% filebench.sum_operations/s
32765 -40.3% 19568 ± 13% filebench.sum_reads/s
0.00 ± 33% +1911.1% 0.03 ± 19% filebench.sum_time_ms/op
20275 ± 31% +269.7% 74961 ± 8% filebench.time.voluntary_context_switches
65.23 ± 10% +6225.9% 4126 ± 16% proc-vmstat.nr_active_file
517254 -1.5% 509753 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
65.23 ± 10% +6225.9% 4126 ± 16% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file
517254 -1.5% 509753 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
1199999 +24.8% 1497636 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
13948 +1878.7% 276000 proc-vmstat.pgactivate
1767189 +17.2% 2070794 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
1733917 +17.5% 2037105 proc-vmstat.pgfree
1.462e+08 +4.8% 1.532e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
1683 ± 3% +210.4% 5224 ± 5% perf-stat.i.context-switches
1.943e+08 +4.9% 2.038e+08 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
98635751 +5.4% 1.039e+08 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
177093 +18.5% 209883 ± 3% perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
7.228e+08 +4.5% 7.552e+08 perf-stat.i.instructions
3.91 ± 3% +6.2% 4.15 ± 2% perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
10.86 -0.5 10.34 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
6.91 ± 2% -3.6% 6.66 perf-stat.overall.cpi
80.11 -2.6 77.55 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
1012 +2.9% 1042 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss
1.455e+08 +4.8% 1.524e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
1674 ± 3% +209.9% 5188 ± 5% perf-stat.ps.context-switches
1.933e+08 +4.9% 2.028e+08 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
98135969 +5.3% 1.034e+08 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
176255 +18.5% 208779 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
7.19e+08 +4.5% 7.512e+08 perf-stat.ps.instructions
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists