[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTI6zM0MUlfglkD+@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:31:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...e.com, willy@...radead.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, hannes@...xchg.org, osalvador@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: page_alloc: skip memoryless nodes entirely
* Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> In find_next_best_node(), We skipped the memoryless nodes
s/We
/we
s/the memoryless nodes
/memoryless nodes
> when building the zonelists of other normal nodes (N_NORMAL),
> but did not skip the memoryless node itself when building
> the zonelist. This will cause it to be traversed at runtime.
>
> For example, say we have node0 and node1, node0 is memoryless
> node, then the fallback order of node0 and node1 as follows:
>
> [ 0.153005] Fallback order for Node 0: 0 1
> [ 0.153564] Fallback order for Node 1: 1
>
> After this patch, we skip memoryless node0 entirely, then
> the fallback order of node0 and node1 as follows:
s/fallback
/fall back
>
> [ 0.155236] Fallback order for Node 0: 1
> [ 0.155806] Fallback order for Node 1: 1
>
> So it becomes completely invisible, which will reduce runtime
> overhead.
>
> And in this way, we will not try to allocate pages from memoryless
> node0, then the panic mentioned in [1] will also be fixed. Even though
> this problem has been solved by dropping the NODE_MIN_SIZE constrain
> in x86 [2], it would be better to fix it in core MM as well.
s/in core MM
/in the core MM
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230212110305.93670-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
> [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231017062215.171670-1-rppt@kernel.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> + /*
> + * Use the local node if we haven't already. But for memoryless local
> + * node, we should skip it and fallback to other nodes.
s/fallback
/fall back
s/already. But
/already, but
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists