[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e11ab885-10dc-4efa-8171-ebdb3ca61b24@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 13:50:40 +0200
From: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: acpi: More fixes to the consolidation
rework
Op 19-10-2023 om 19:34 schreef Andy Shevchenko:
> On top what Hans already fixed, Ferry reported a few bugs that pointed
> out to the same consolidation rework done in v6.2.
>
> The first is most serious issue, that needs to be fixed ASAP.
>
> The second is good to have.
>
> And the third one I'm not fully okay with, so open for advice on
> how to improve.
>
> Note, that long list of parameters to a _find_gpio() functions
> can be hidden in the specifically crafted a new data structure,
> but this is out of scope of the _fixes_ series. I'm all ears as
> well for that one.
>
> Andy Shevchenko (3):
> gpiolib: acpi: Add missing memset(0) to acpi_get_gpiod_from_data()
> gpiolib: Fix debug messaging in gpiod_find_and_request()
> gpiolib: Make debug messages in gpiod_find_by_fwnode() less confusing
For the series
Tested-by: Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 10 ++++-----
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.h | 13 ++++++------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 13 ++++++------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.h | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 7 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists