[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtD4eWKDT2pPDUHwfGPGC1kNy1qWnY4rJg2yyCHk9mdfvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:48:21 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Update ->next_balance correctly during newidle balance
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 09:53, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
...
> > curr_cost += domain_cost;
> > t0 = t1;
>
> Okay, I'm applying patches #2 and #3, without #1: it should be safe
> out of order, but let me know if I missed something ...
Could you hold on for patch 3 ? As replied to Joel, the patch had
regression in the update of rq->next_balance
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists