[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231020153921.54m3pg4ocb4wy4jn@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:39:21 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com,
baruch@...s.co.il, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, nathan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 10:14:48AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:46 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 09:35:48PM +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
> > > + "#pwm-cells":
> > > + const: 2
> >
> > The driver only supports normal polarity. Is this a shortcoming of the
> > driver, or is the hardware incapable to do that, too?
> >
> > If it's only the former I'd want #pwm-cells = <3> here. For ease of use
> > I'd not oppose if you pick #pwm-cells = <3> even if the hardware can
> > only do normal polarity.
>
> Devi, Can we get an answer here soon.
>
> The MFD part has been applied and it references this schema causing
> warnings. So this needs to land or MFD schema reverted.
Or the reference to the pwm stuff deleted from the mfd binding?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists