| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231021094622.vozvbdzw46ke272e@basti-XPS-13-9310>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 11:46:22 +0200
From: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
To: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
Cc: Nícolas F . R . A . Prado
<nfraprado@...labora.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Nathan Hebert <nhebert@...omium.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Steve Cho <stevecho@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] media: mediatek: vcodec: Getting the chip name of
each platform
Hey Yunfei,
please replace "Getting" with "Get" in the title and replace "of each"
with "for each".
On 21.10.2023 10:30, Sebastian Fricke wrote:
>Hey Yunfei,
>
>Thanks for your patches!
>
>Could you provide a cover-letter for the next version please?
>This will help to get a good context of why we need these changes and to
>store the changelog in a helpful manner.
>Thanks.
>
>On 16.10.2023 14:43, Yunfei Dong wrote:
>>Getting the chip name of each platform according to the device
>>compatible to set different parameter.
>
>I would reword this commit description slightly, basically what you
>change is that you store the chip name in context permanently and that
>you utilize a enum to be more descriptive.
>
>So how about:
>
>"""
>Store the name of the chip in the context of the driver in order to be
>able to choose the correct configuration values for the different codecs.
>Use a enum value instead of an integer to store a more descriptive name.
>"""
>
>A few more comments below.
>
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
>>---
>>.../mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec.c | 24 +----------------
>>.../vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>>.../vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.h | 17 ++++++++++++
>>3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec.c
>>index 91ed576d6821..ba742f0e391d 100644
>>--- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec.c
>>+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec.c
>>@@ -208,36 +208,14 @@ static int vidioc_vdec_dqbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
>> return v4l2_m2m_dqbuf(file, ctx->m2m_ctx, buf);
>>}
>>
>>-static int mtk_vcodec_dec_get_chip_name(void *priv)
>>-{
>>- struct mtk_vcodec_dec_ctx *ctx = fh_to_dec_ctx(priv);
>>- struct device *dev = &ctx->dev->plat_dev->dev;
>>-
>>- if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8173;
>>- else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8183-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8183;
>>- else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8192;
>>- else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8195;
>>- else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8186-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8186;
>>- else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8188-vcodec-dec"))
>>- return 8188;
>>- else
>>- return 8173;
>>-}
>>-
>>static int vidioc_vdec_querycap(struct file *file, void *priv,
>> struct v4l2_capability *cap)
>>{
>> struct mtk_vcodec_dec_ctx *ctx = fh_to_dec_ctx(priv);
>> struct device *dev = &ctx->dev->plat_dev->dev;
>>- int platform_name = mtk_vcodec_dec_get_chip_name(priv);
>>
>> strscpy(cap->driver, dev->driver->name, sizeof(cap->driver));
>>- snprintf(cap->card, sizeof(cap->card), "MT%d video decoder", platform_name);
>>+ snprintf(cap->card, sizeof(cap->card), "MT%d video decoder", ctx->dev->chip_name);
>>
>> return 0;
>>}
>>diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
>>index 0a89ce452ac3..f47c98faf068 100644
>>--- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
>>+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
>>@@ -326,6 +326,26 @@ static const struct v4l2_file_operations mtk_vcodec_fops = {
>> .mmap = v4l2_m2m_fop_mmap,
>>};
>>
>>+static void mtk_vcodec_dec_get_chip_name(struct mtk_vcodec_dec_dev *vdec_dev)
>>+{
>>+ struct device *dev = &vdec_dev->plat_dev->dev;
>>+
>>+ if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8173;
>>+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8183-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8183;
>>+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8192;
>>+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8195;
>>+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8186-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8186;
>>+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "mediatek,mt8188-vcodec-dec"))
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_MT8188;
>>+ else
>>+ vdec_dev->chip_name = MTK_VDEC_INVAL;
>>+}
>>+
>>static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>{
>> struct mtk_vcodec_dec_dev *dev;
>>@@ -341,6 +361,12 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ctx_list);
>> dev->plat_dev = pdev;
>>
>>+ mtk_vcodec_dec_get_chip_name(dev);
>>+ if (dev->chip_name == MTK_VDEC_INVAL) {
>>+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get decoder chip name");
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+ }
>>+
>> dev->vdec_pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>> if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,vpu",
>> &rproc_phandle)) {
>>diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.h b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.h
>>index 7e36b2c69b7d..8f228ba9aa47 100644
>>--- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.h
>>+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/decoder/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.h
>>@@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
>>#define IS_VDEC_LAT_ARCH(hw_arch) ((hw_arch) >= MTK_VDEC_LAT_SINGLE_CORE)
>>#define IS_VDEC_INNER_RACING(capability) ((capability) & MTK_VCODEC_INNER_RACING)
>>
>>+/*
>>+ * enum mtk_vcodec_dec_chip_name - Structure used to separate different platform
>>+ */
>
>I don't feel like this comment is terribly helpful because it is pretty
>clear what the enum is about, I would just drop it.
>
>>+enum mtk_vcodec_dec_chip_name {
>>+ MTK_VDEC_INVAL = 0,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8173 = 8173,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8183 = 8183,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8186 = 8186,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8188 = 8188,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8192 = 8192,
>>+ MTK_VDEC_MT8195 = 8195,
>>+};
>>+
>>/*
>> * enum mtk_vdec_format_types - Structure used to get supported
>> * format types according to decoder capability
>>@@ -249,6 +262,8 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dec_ctx {
>> * @vdec_racing_info: record register value
>> * @dec_racing_info_mutex: mutex lock used for inner racing mode
>> * @dbgfs: debug log related information
>>+ *
>>+ * @chip_name: the chip name used to separate different platform
>
>I wouldn't repeat chip name in the description and specify more
>concretely why we need to separate the platforms.
>
>My suggestion:
>
> * @chip_name: used to distinguish platforms and select the correct codec configuration values.
>
>> */
>>struct mtk_vcodec_dec_dev {
>> struct v4l2_device v4l2_dev;
>>@@ -289,6 +304,8 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dec_dev {
>> /* Protects access to vdec_racing_info data */
>> struct mutex dec_racing_info_mutex;
>> struct mtk_vcodec_dbgfs dbgfs;
>>+
>>+ enum mtk_vcodec_dec_chip_name chip_name;
>>};
>>
>>static inline struct mtk_vcodec_dec_ctx *fh_to_dec_ctx(struct v4l2_fh *fh)
>
>Besides those small wording choices, the patch looks good.
>
>So with these issues resolved:
>
>Reviewed-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
>
>Regards,
>Sebastian
>>--
>>2.18.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists