[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C29ACB-0CC2-4484-A3D3-11F33FD08BEB@vmware.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 14:27:10 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/percpu: Introduce const-qualified const_pcpu_hot
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:19 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
>
> By implementing constant-qualified const_pcpu_hot, the compiler can
> eliminate redundant reads from the constant variables, reducing the
> number of loads from current_task from 3766 to 3217 on a test build,
> a -14.6% reduction.
Thanks again for doing that. LGTM! [*]
--
[*] The negative sign here is unneeded, but that’s just me being
negative. ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists