[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023102147-educator-worry-06f4@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 16:45:46 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@...il.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kumaran.4353@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Alignment should match open parenthesis
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 06:35:27AM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kumaran.4353@...il.com
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <2023102131-slacker-lily-28ff@...gkh>
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:48:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:39:49PM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> > > Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
> > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > index cdbb42cd413b..405c8e78aa72 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int gb_camera_operation_sync_flags(struct gb_connection *connection,
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int gb_camera_get_max_pkt_size(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > > - struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
> > > + struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int max_pkt_size = 0;
> > > unsigned int i;
> > > @@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ static int gb_camera_get_max_pkt_size(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > > * Validate the stream configuration response verifying padding is correctly
> > > * set and the returned number of streams is supported
> > > */
> > > -static const int gb_camera_configure_streams_validate_response(
> > > - struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > > +static const int gb_camera_configure_streams_validate_response(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> >
> > Why change this line?
> >
> did these Code change to fix CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' reported by
> checkpatch.pl
That's great, but you didn't say that in your changelog text, so it
looks wrong here :(
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists