[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <808d2409-09aa-4adb-9d91-46f97cefc6c1@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 19:02:59 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, ilia.lin@...nel.org,
sivaprak@...eaurora.org, quic_kathirav@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: Use stromer plus ops for
stromer plus pll
On 10/20/23 08:19, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> The set rate and determine rate operations are different between
> Stromer and Stromer Plus PLLs. Since the programming sequence is
> different, the PLLs dont get configured properly and random,
> inexplicable crash/freeze is seen. Hence, use stromer plus ops
> for ipq_pll_stromer_plus.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Fixes: c7ef7fbb1ccf ("clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: add support for IPQ5332")
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists