lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 19:21:34 -0700
From:   Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com,
        Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/6] x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 02:33:47AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 21/10/2023 2:18 am, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> Also it avoids playing games with hiding data inside an instruction.
> >> It's a neat trick, but the neater trick is avoid it whenever possible.
> > Thanks for the pointers. I think verw in 32-bit mode won't be able to
> > address the operand outside of 4GB range.
> 
> And?  In a 32bit kernel, what lives outside of a 4G range?
> 
> > Maybe this is fine or could it
> > be a problem addressing from e.g. KVM module?
> 
> RIP-relative addressing is disp32.  Which is the same as it is for
> direct calls.
> 
> So if your module is far enough away for VERW to have issues, you've got
> far more basic problems to solve first.

Sorry, I raised the wrong problem. In 64-bit mode, verww only has 32-bit
of relative addressing, so memory operand has to be within 4GB of
callsite. That could be a constraint.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists