[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTN0xgGNefllUm7Q@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:50:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Update ->next_balance correctly during
newidle balance
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 09:53, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> ...
>
> > > curr_cost += domain_cost;
> > > t0 = t1;
> >
> > Okay, I'm applying patches #2 and #3, without #1: it should be safe
> > out of order, but let me know if I missed something ...
>
> Could you hold on for patch 3 ? As replied to Joel, the patch had
> regression in the update of rq->next_balance
Yeah, patch #3 is gone already from tip:sched/core.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists