linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] drivers/perf: add DesignWare PCIe PMU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <673a0032-db43-4708-ac71-c8bef3fd8e56@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:27:19 +0800
From:   Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     chengyou@...ux.alibaba.com, kaishen@...ux.alibaba.com,
        will@...nel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        robin.murphy@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] drivers/perf: add DesignWare PCIe PMU driver



On 2023/10/21 00:49, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:29 +0800
> Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
>> This commit adds the PCIe Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) driver support
>> for T-Head Yitian SoC chip. Yitian is based on the Synopsys PCI Express
>> Core controller IP which provides statistics feature. The PMU is a PCIe
>> configuration space register block provided by each PCIe Root Port in a
>> Vendor-Specific Extended Capability named RAS D.E.S (Debug, Error
>> injection, and Statistics).
>>
>> To facilitate collection of statistics the controller provides the
>> following two features for each Root Port:
>>
>> - one 64-bit counter for Time Based Analysis (RX/TX data throughput and
>>   time spent in each low-power LTSSM state) and
>> - one 32-bit counter for Event Counting (error and non-error events for
>>   a specified lane)
>>
>> Note: There is no interrupt for counter overflow.
>>
>> This driver adds PMU devices for each PCIe Root Port. And the PMU device is
>> named based the BDF of Root Port. For example,
>>
>>     30:03.0 PCI bridge: Device 1ded:8000 (rev 01)
>>
>> the PMU device name for this Root Port is dwc_rootport_3018.
>>
>> Example usage of counting PCIe RX TLP data payload (Units of bytes)::
>>
>>     $# perf stat -a -e dwc_rootport_3018/Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload/
>>
>> average RX bandwidth can be calculated like this:
>>
>>     PCIe TX Bandwidth = Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload / Measure_Time_Window
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> LGTM other than some really trivial stuff inline if you are doing a v10
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Hi, Jonathan,

Thank you for your prompt response.

The fact that this [3/4] patch has received a Reviewed-by tag from the
community is a momentous milestone for both the patchset itself and for me
personally. I am deeply grateful for the time and effort you have dedicated
to providing valuable comments, as it has significantly improved the code's
quality.

I will address the inline comments in the upcoming version v10. However, I
kindly request some time to wait for feedback from esteemed reviewers such
as Yicong, Bjorn, Will, or anyone else who may find this patchset
intriguing.

Best Regards and Cheers.
Shuai


>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Unwind when platform driver removes */
>> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(
>> +			&plat_dev->dev, dwc_pcie_pmu_remove_cpuhp_instance,
>> +			&pcie_pmu->cpuhp_node);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto out;
>> +
>> +		ret = perf_pmu_register(&pcie_pmu->pmu, name, -1);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			pci_err(pdev,
>> +				"Error %d registering PMU @%x\n", ret, bdf);
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Cache PMU to handle pci device hotplug */
>> +		list_add(&pcie_pmu->pmu_node, &dwc_pcie_pmu_head);
>> +		pcie_pmu->registered = true;
>> +		notify = true;
>> +
>> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(
>> +			&plat_dev->dev, dwc_pcie_pmu_unregister_pmu, pcie_pmu);
> 
> line wrapping is a bit ugly - I would move the &plat_dev->dev to previous line.
> and I think you can get away with aligning the rest just after the (
> 

Actually, I warp this with VSCode automaticlly :(
Will move the &plat_dev->dev to previous line.


> 
> 
> 
>> +static int __init dwc_pcie_pmu_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
>> +				      "perf/dwc_pcie_pmu:online",
>> +				      dwc_pcie_pmu_online_cpu,
>> +				      dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	dwc_pcie_pmu_hp_state = ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&dwc_pcie_pmu_driver);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto platform_driver_register_err;
>> +
>> +	dwc_pcie_pmu_dev = platform_device_register_simple(
>> +				"dwc_pcie_pmu", PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, NULL, 0);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dwc_pcie_pmu_dev)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dwc_pcie_pmu_dev);
>> +		goto platform_device_register_error;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +platform_device_register_error:
> 
> Trivial but I'd standardize on err or error, not mix them.

Sorry, will fix it.

> 
>> +	platform_driver_unregister(&dwc_pcie_pmu_driver);
>> +platform_driver_register_err:
>> +	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(dwc_pcie_pmu_hp_state);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}