linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: samsung: exynos4412-midas: fix key-ok event code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:51:05 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@...tonmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: samsung: exynos4412-midas: fix key-ok
 event code

On 17/10/2023 12:18, Raymond Hackley wrote:
> Input event code 139 stands for KEY_MENU, instead of KEY_OK as node name
> key-ok inplies. Fix it with correct event code 0x160.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@...tonmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412-midas.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412-midas.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> index 7daf25865551..3c1ae3c19828 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/samsung/exynos4412-midas.dtsi
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ key-power {
>  
>  		key-ok {
>  			gpios = <&gpx0 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> -			linux,code = <139>;
> +			linux,code = <0x160>;

I applied this and was about to send in pull request, but it does not
seem right, sorry. The button was always called "menu" button. Why
changing it to OK? Just because of node name? The node name does not
matter, this could be called "key-1" as well..

Best regards,
Krzysztof