linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEUSe7-zbuRsgsr2EYq+OeW9iEJyZHmo8u9K3pDCAFRKnCEv0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:16:33 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

Hello!

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 09:11, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 23/10/23 4:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release.
> > There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.137-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> We see lots of errors on Arm 32-bits:
>
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:249:11: error: 'IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'IS_IMMUTABLE'?
>    .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             IS_IMMUTABLE
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: error: 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS' undeclared here (not in a function)
>    GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: note: (near initialization for 'vf610_irqchip')
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c: In function 'vf610_gpio_probe':
> /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip'; did you mean 'gpiochip_get_data'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    gpiochip_get_data
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> ----->8-----

Bisection points to "gpio: vf610: make irq_chip immutable" (upstream
commit e6ef4f8ede09f4af7cde000717b349b50bc62576).

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org