[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231023210920.p53cxpxptocpgcw4@desk>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:09:20 -0700
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/bugs: Use ALTERNATIVE() instead of
mds_user_clear static key
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:48:44AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:45:15PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > @@ -484,11 +484,11 @@ static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void)
> > if (cpu_mitigations_off())
> > return;
> >
> > - if (!static_key_enabled(&mds_user_clear))
> > + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USER_CLEAR_CPU_BUF))
> > goto out;
> >
> > /*
> > - * mds_user_clear is now enabled. Update MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data
> > + * X86_FEATURE_USER_CLEAR_CPU_BUF is now enabled. Update MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data
> > * mitigation, if necessary.
> > */
>
> This comment line got long, the paragraph can be reformatted.
Yes, will fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists