lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nTE_qua9w+EeqiPCukst4876Gi7gHeusFLofYZRoJCDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:15:53 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
        Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/rust: depend on !RETHUNK

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 8:43 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
<yakoyoku@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I'll mention that I've tested boots, both in bare metal and QEMU, with
> `RUST=y` and `RETHUNK=y` and they were alright regardless of `objtool`
> warnings. Although, if you had an issue in the past then I'd like to know
> about it.

These are mitigations -- things do functionally work if they are not
applied, but you would be vulnerable.

In other words, it is not like e.g. IBT where you could have noticed
it breaking by running it normally if you happened to have a supported
platform.

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ