[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7af782f3-fe6c-415b-a993-55962845a102@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:32:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, quic_collinsd@...cinc.com,
quic_kamalw@...cinc.com, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ARM: dts: qcom: Update devicetree for ADC7 rename
for QCOM PMICs
On 23/10/2023 08:09, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 7/9/2023 10:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/07/2023 09:28, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
>>> The name "ADC7" needs to be replaced with the name "ADC5_GEN2"
>>> everywhere to match the convention used for these ADC peripherals
>>> on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. PMICs. Update devicetree files for
>> We do not rename compatibles to match convention. Please provide proper
>> rationale.
>
> I'll avoid renaming the compatible directly, will just mark it
> deprecated - but is it fine to do the other changes, for updating the
> macro names used in devicetree (replacing the ADC7 macros with the ADC5
> Gen2 macros)?
Please provide proper rationale why "ADC7 needs to be replaced". Your
marketing is not a proper rationale.
>
> I do see an example of a macro change in devicetree done in this patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
>
> Patch 2 here replaced some macro definitions:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f9284873c2993a9952d9fe4f8dd5e89f20daab75.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
>
> Patch 3 made the corresponding update in devicetree files:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/db92d209fa700f7da8bc8028083476fcc138d80e.1646388139.git.zong.li@sifive.com/.
And what is rationale in that patchset?
>
>
> From this mail, it looks like the maintainer was willing to pick them
> at that time:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220315225652.CDAD1C340E8@smtp.kernel.org/,
> would something similar be possible here?
For stated before marketing reasons - no, would not be possible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists