[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c3f95e3-26de-4911-a89c-c69690e0f370@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:43:15 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Luka Panio <lukapanio@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-xiaomi-pipa: Add initial
device tree
On 22/10/2023 21:56, Luka Panio wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 8:46 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> If there are no other copyrights here, why did you use BSD-3 license?
> I am by no means a licensing expert, but as sm8250.dts did use BSD-3
> and other device tree's (for example sm8250-xiaomi-elish-boe.dts) did
> use it, I thought I should do the same. Should I drop it?
Did you base your work on these files? This would explain the license,
but then please include original copyrights.
>
>>
>> chassis-type
>>
>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>> `make dtbs_check W=1` (see
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
>> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
>> for instructions).
>>
> Thanks, will do.
>
>> 0x34 or 34?
> Yes 0x24, should i tend to use decimal?
Please do not trim the content that much. How can I know to what you
refer here? What was in original code? 0x24?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists