lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:01:28 +0000
From:   Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To:     Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io>
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
        Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: macros: improve `#[vtable]` documentation

On 21.10.23 14:45, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On 10/19/23 19:15, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> Traits marked with `#[vtable]` need to provide default implementations
>> for optional functions. The C side represents these with `NULL` in the
>> vtable, so the default functions are never actually called. We do not
>> want to replicate the default behavior from C in Rust, because that is
>> not maintainable. Therefore we should use `build_error` in those default
>> implementations. The error message for that is provided at
>> `kernel::error::VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR`.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> 
> There is a minor nit below, and in reviews sent by others, but overall
> this looks fine to me.
> 
>>    /// # Examples
>>    ///
>>    /// ```ignore
>> +/// # use kernel::error::VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR;
>>    /// use kernel::prelude::*;
> I probably wouldn't hide the import of VTABLE_DEFAULT_ERROR from this
> example.

What do you guys think of putting the const it in the prelude?

-- 
Cheers,
Benno


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ