[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023102338-repaying-golf-a200@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:27:47 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next
tree
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:47:20PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_devlink.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3465915e9985 ("staging: qlge: devlink health: use retained error fmsg API")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> 875be090928d ("staging: qlge: Retire the driver")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just deleted the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
Wonderful, thanks for deleting the file.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists