[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a523a854-5ba3-670c-f0ee-5ec259043b74@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 17:11:49 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: fenghui <fenghui@...china.com>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog_core: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret
On 10/21/23 03:57, fenghui wrote:
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: fenghui <fenghui@...china.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> index 5b55ccae06d4..dceaf5cc89fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int watchdog_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
> void *data)
> {
> struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> wdd = container_of(nb, struct watchdog_device, pm_nb);
>
NACK
Complete code:
static int watchdog_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
void *data)
{
struct watchdog_device *wdd;
int ret = 0;
wdd = container_of(nb, struct watchdog_device, pm_nb);
switch (mode) {
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
ret = watchdog_dev_suspend(wdd);
break;
case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
ret = watchdog_dev_resume(wdd);
break;
}
if (ret)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
ret is not set in the default: case.
I don't know what this is about; you have submitted two patches
in a row, both of which would introduce a problem if accepted.
Is this a test ? Either case, please refrain from submitting
such patches in the future.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists