linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: allow slew rate bit in main pin config register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:22:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: allow slew rate bit in
 main pin config register

On 23/10/2023 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Changes in v2
> 
> I tried to apply this to the pinctrl devel branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel
> 
> It doesn't apply, could you rebase it?

The context depends on my previous fix which you applied and sent for
v6.6 already:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CACRpkdaybnYEmkgv7VG4fh5sXQ7uwHm2wH2Khja-P1b6idYr8w@mail.gmail.com/

I can rebase, but I am afraid it will cause conflicts. Is it reasonable
for you to merge v6.6-rc7 into your devel branch?



Best regards,
Krzysztof