[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y1ft1yyo.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:21:43 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 4/4] printk: Ignore waiter on panic
On 2023-10-18, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> Well, I have spent some time thinking about possible scenarios and I would
> go even further. I would block also console_lock_spinning_enable()
> Also I would do the checks before taking console_owner_lock.
>
> It would make the behavior symmetric. And more importantly, it would prevent
> possible deadlocks caused by console_owner_lock.
>
> See the proposed patch below. I created it to see the changes in the
> code. Also I added info about possible scenarios and effects.
Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
I will use your patch for the next version of this series.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists