[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TYBPR01MB53418269A5C6F1419D007338D8D8A@TYBPR01MB5341.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:36:21 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
Hello Krzysztof,
> From: Krzysztof Wilczyński, Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 4:35 PM
>
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the pci tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > ERROR: modpost: "dw_pcie_write_dbi2" [drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.ko] undefined!
> [...]
>
> > However, I completely forgot it...
>
> That's OK. Don't worry. :)
>
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20230926122431.3974714-8-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com/
> >
> > I confirmed that the patch above can be applied on the latest pci.git / next branch.
>
> I will take care of it.
Thank you very much for your support!
> > However, should I resend whole patches with the patch above as v26?
>
> No. There is no need to send another series.
I got it.
> Different question: aren't RCar systems based on Arm?
You're correct. R-Car systems based on Arm.
> I wonder why this
> even built on a x86_64 - unless I am wrong about this.
This is because I added COMPILE_TEST to the Kconfig like below:
---
config PCIE_RCAR_GEN4_HOST
tristate "Renesas R-Car Gen4 PCIe controller (host mode)"
depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
---
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists