linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt7986: remove redundant remove function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:07:02 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Maso Huang <maso.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: mediatek: mt7986: remove redundant remove
 function

Il 23/10/23 11:54, Maso Huang ha scritto:
> Remove redundant remove function of mt7986-wm8960.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maso Huang <maso.huang@...iatek.com>

You're doing more than what you're advertising; you are:

1. Dropping the remove callback; and
2. Removing the mt7986_wm8960_priv structure

You can do that in one single commit if you really want to, but you have to
use the appropriate commit title and description, saying exactly what you're doing.

Regards,
Angelo