[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231023114447.crn3bt4qdmkxkrxi@quack3>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:44:47 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gouhaojake@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: delete redundant calculations in
ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock()
On Mon 23-10-23 09:34:16, Gou Hao wrote:
> 'blocks_per_page' is always 1 after 'if (blocks_per_page >= 2)',
> 'pnum' and 'block' is equal in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhaojake@....com>
No need for two signed-off-by here. Any one from you is enough :)
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 454d5612641e..8442f5474b25 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -1456,9 +1456,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock(struct super_block *sb,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - block++;
> - pnum = block / blocks_per_page;
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, pnum, gfp);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, ++block, gfp);
^^^ perhaps just
"block + 1" here? Maybe also add a comment before this call like:
/* blocks_per_page == 1, hence we need another page for the buddy */
Otherwise the patch looks good!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists