[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e640c995-4751-464b-b6fc-106be822ae1c@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:03:32 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
<quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>,
Harsh Agarwal <quic_harshq@...cinc.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/10] usb: dwc3: core: Refactor PHY logic to support
Multiport Controller
On 10/23/2023 2:41 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>> Multiport currently.
>>>
>>> You use capitalised "Multiport" in several places it seems. Is this an
>>> established term for these controllers or should it just be "multiport"
>>> or "multiple ports"?
>>>
>> This is an established term AFAIK. So I've been using it here like this.
>
> Do you have a pointer? A google search seems to mostly come up with
> links to this patch series.
Only pointer I had is the hardware programming guide internally. It
mentioned "Multiport" as an established term. I think that is self
explanatory in usb context. Isn't it ?
Regards,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists