linux-kernel - Re: Aw: [RFC v1] arm64: dts: mediatek: add dtbs with applied overlays for bpi-r3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:45:08 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     frank-w@...lic-files.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>
Subject: Re: Aw: [RFC v1] arm64: dts: mediatek: add dtbs with applied overlays
 for bpi-r3

On 23/10/2023 15:36, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Am 23. Oktober 2023 15:25:27 MESZ schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>> On 23/10/2023 13:59, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>> Hi Rob/Krzysztof
>>>
>>> can you please give an Ack or tell me if something is wrong?
>>
>> Hm? I do not recall being the maintainer of Mediatek. Why do you need an
>> Ack from me?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> I asked you because rob suggested the fix,but does not confirm i have done it right. I guess you have same role,or am i wrong here (sorry then)?
> 
> If no ack is needed, then mtk maintainer can apply it to solve the problem rob reports? So then we can continue with additional dts changes

There is no requirement from a reporter/suggester to confirm your fix.
Just like with every patch, anyone is welcomed to review, so pinging
specific non-mandatory reviewer is rather noise in our mailboxes.

Best regards,
Krzysztof